University of Limerick Institutional Repository

Self-modelled versus skilled-peer modelled AO+MI effects on skilled sensorimotor performance: A stage 2 registered report

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McNeill, Eoghan
dc.contributor.author Toth, Adam J.
dc.contributor.author Ramsbottom, Niall
dc.contributor.author Campbell, Mark J.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-22T09:11:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/9799
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description The full text of this article will not be available in ULIR until the embargo expires on the 09/02/2023
dc.description.abstract Action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) are simulation states that have been demonstrated to independently enhance motor skill performance. Historically, AO and MI were examined in isolation from one another; however recent neurophysiological and behavioural evidence indicates that using MI during AO (AO+MI) may be more potent at enhancing performance than either simulation state alone. The AO component of AO+MI is typically delivered via a self-model or skilled-peer model paradigm, via an observation video. The purpose of the proposed study was to further examine the implementation of AO+MI states by directly comparing the effectiveness of self-modelled AO+MI and skilled-peer modelled AO+MI for augmenting performance on a golf putting task with a sample of 56 skilled golfers. Our primary hypothesis was that skilled participants who engaged with a self-model intervention would improve their performance more than those engaging with a skilled-peer model intervention. Results showed no significant differences in putting accuracy or precision improvement following the two conditions. However, the self-model group did significantly improve their club-path kinematics more than the skilled peer-model group. We suggest self-observation combined with MI can facilitate error detection and correction in skilled performers only on aspects of motor control most easily viewed during AO. These findings add to an emerging body of literature outlining the conditions in which AO+MI can effectively enhance sensorimotor skill performance. The stage 1 report can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101683. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Psychology of Sport and Exercise;54, 101910
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101910
dc.rights This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Psychology of Sport and Exercise. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2021,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101910 en_US
dc.subject motor imagery en_US
dc.subject skilled golfers en_US
dc.title Self-modelled versus skilled-peer modelled AO+MI effects on skilled sensorimotor performance: A stage 2 registered report en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101910
dc.date.embargoEndDate 2023-02-09
dc.embargo.terms 2023-02-09 en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics