University of Limerick Institutional Repository

The experiences of primary pre-service teachers enacting assessment for learning in physical education during school placement

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor MacPhail, Ann
dc.contributor.advisor Calerón, Antonio
dc.contributor.author Macken, Suzanne
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-07T14:53:20Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-07T14:53:20Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/7560
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract Assessment for learning (AfL) has been widely acknowledged in the literature as having significant gains for teaching and student learning if implemented effectively (Black & Wiliam, 1998). Yet despite such recognition of the effectiveness of using assessment strategies, embedding assessment within the teaching of physical education is considered ‘as one of the most troublesome topics’ (López-Pastor et al., 2013, p. 57). This study explored the experiences of primary pre-service teachers (PSTs) enacting assessment for learning (AfL) in physical education during school placement. In addition, the impact of mentoring, continuous upskilling opportunities, and the realities of school placement on PST enactment of AfL were examined. School placement components of initial teacher education programmes are integral to pre-service teacher development, however, PSTs’ ability to transfer theory into their school placement remains a challenge (Lorente-Catalán & Kirk, 2016). Ogan-Bekiroglu & Suzuk (2014) found that although PSTs identified key elements of assessment literacy in theory, they had difficulty in implementing this into practice. Through an extensive review of the literature, it is evident that no research on PSTs’ assessment literacy in teaching primary physical education has been conducted. While research on primary teacher assessment literacy revealed low levels of assessment literacy for primary teachers in the teaching of physical education (Dinan-Thompson & Penney, 2015), no further research on primary teachers’ or PSTs’ assessment literacy around physical education is evident. Using a longitudinal action research approach (Pettigrew, 1990; McNiff, 1998) the practitioner-researcher teacher educator engaged in participant observation with five primary PSTs. Data was generated using researcher field notes, primary PST reflective journals and individual primary PST interviews. Drawing on the views of Collins, Brown, & Newman (1989), a cognitive apprenticeship framework positioned with the social constructivist paradigm was adopted as the theoretical framework. Findings indicate that PSTs were functioning at a low level of assessment literacy in enactment of assessment for learning in phase one following the completion of a primary physical education module as part of their teacher education programme. The use of a cognitive apprenticeship framework proved effective in raising PST assessment literacy, coupled with regular exposure to teaching primary physical education on school placement. The realities of school placement, such as, the outsourcing of physical education lessons, multi-use of facilities, and behaviour management impacted on PST enactment of AfL. The impact of teacher educator modelling with primary school students proved more effective than the integrated approach to AfL in the physical education module, preparing the PSTs for the complexities of implementing self and peer assessment to a greater extent than when practiced with peers. The need for explicit opportunities for PSTs to practice implementing AfL in their teaching of primary physical education, through modelled practice, is essential in ITE programmes. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher University of Limerick en_US
dc.subject Assessment for learning (AfL) en_US
dc.subject physical education en_US
dc.subject teaching en_US
dc.title The experiences of primary pre-service teachers enacting assessment for learning in physical education during school placement en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_theses_dissertations en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics