University of Limerick Institutional Repository

“Blacklists” and “whitelists”: a salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Houghton, Frank
dc.contributor.author Houghton, Sharon
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-11T14:43:34Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-11T14:43:34Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/7220
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract This commentary addresses the widespread use of racist language in discussions concerning predatory publishing. Examples include terminology such as blacklists, whitelists, and black sheep. The use of such terms does not merely reflect a racist culture, but also serves to legitimize and perpetuate it. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher University of Pittsburgh, University Library System en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of the Medical Library Association;106 (4) , pp. 527-530
dc.relation.uri dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.490
dc.subject blacklists en_US
dc.subject whitelists en_US
dc.subject racist language en_US
dc.subject predatory publishing en_US
dc.title “Blacklists” and “whitelists”: a salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5195/jmla.2018.490
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics