University of Limerick Institutional Repository

Noseband use in equestrian sports - an international study

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Doherty, Orla M.
dc.contributor.author Casey, Vincent
dc.contributor.author McCreevy, Paul
dc.contributor.author Arkins, Sean
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-11T11:13:45Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-11T11:13:45Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/5792
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract Nosebands are used by riders to prevent the horse from opening its mouth, to increase control and, in some cases, to comply with the competition rules. While equestrian texts traditionally recommend that two adult human fingers should be able to fit under a fastened noseband, noseband tightness levels are not, in general, regulated in competition. Possible detrimental consequences for the horse, of excessively tight nosebands, include discomfort, pain or tissue damage. The current study investigated noseband usage in equestrian competition. Data regarding noseband type, position, width and tightness were collected from 750 horses in eventing (n = 354), dressage (n = 334) and performance hunter (n = 62) competitions in Ireland, England and Belgium. Data were collected immediately before or after the performance. Using the ISES taper gauge as a guide, results were classified according to the number of `fingers' that could fit under the noseband at the nasal planum, and assigned to six groups: greater than 2 fingers; 2 fingers; 1.5 fingers; 1 finger; 0.5 fingers; zero fingers. A calliper was used to measure noseband width and position relative to the facial crest. The data were not normally distributed so Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used. In all, 44% of horses fell into the zero fingers classification while only 7% were in the two fingers classification. Significant differences emerged between disciplines (p<0.001), with the highest levels of noseband tightness measured among eventers followed by dressage horses with lowest levels among performance hunters. Noseband tightness did not differ significantly with horse age (p>0.05), which ranged from 4 to 19 years. The flash noseband was the most commonly used noseband (n = 326) and was significantly tighter than the cavesson (p < 0.001), drop noseband (p < 0.001) and the Micklem (p < 0.005). Noseband width ranged from 10 to 50 mm. Noseband position varied widely with the distance between the facial crest and upper noseband margin ranging from 0 to 70 mm. The high proportion of very tight nosebands found in this study raises concerns regarding the short and long term behavioural and physiological consequences of such tight nosebands are for the horse. Although these data are currently lacking, the findings are of concern. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries PLoS ONE;12 (1), e0169060
dc.relation.uri http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169060
dc.subject horses en_US
dc.subject headshaking en_US
dc.subject nerve en_US
dc.subject compression en_US
dc.title Noseband use in equestrian sports - an international study en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.date.updated 2017-05-11T10:42:06Z
dc.description.version PUBLISHED
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0169060
dc.contributor.sponsor The Royal Dublin Society en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.internal.rssid 2698957
dc.internal.copyrightchecked Yes
dc.identifier.journaltitle Plos One
dc.description.status peer-reviewed


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics