University of Limerick Institutional Repository

The PBP Bow-Tie framework for the systematic representation and comparison of military aviation regulatory frameworks

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Purton, Leon
dc.contributor.author Clothier, Reece
dc.contributor.author Kourousis, Kyriakos I.
dc.contributor.author Massey, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-02T10:19:03Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-02T10:19:03Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/5490
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper presents a novel framework, based on traditional system safety modelling approaches, for the representation and comparison of airworthiness aviation frameworks. A disparate array of military airworthiness frameworks have emerged due to a lack of standardisation and the absence of a recognised organisation needed for the harmonisation of military regulatory frameworks.. The complexity and subsequent cost in inter-agency recognition of existing certification programs has led to the establishment of a European forum of military airworthiness authorities. The forum is working towards establishing a common regulatory framework across its European member states. The common framework provides the systematic basis for a certification of military aircraft that can be readily recognised by all of the member states. This will have many cost and efficiency benefits for the EU. The framework and recognition process have recently been accepted as a method for establishing recognition outside of Europe, with some identified shortfalls. This paper establishes a method for overcoming these shortfalls for nations outside of europe. The Product-Behaviour-Process (PBP) Bow-Tie, which is a novel application of the traditional bowtie risk modelling tool, derives test points that capture the airworthiness attestations for the high-level engineering lifecycle processes of design, production and maintenance. The proposed framework is used to provide a comparison between the Australian Defence Force and United States Army regulatory frameworks. The comparative case-study clearly demonstrates the benefit of the PBP Bow-Tie model in its ability to systematically represent the disparate regulatory frameworks. A novel representation of the output is also described, which facilitates a visual comparison of the results. The application of the PBP Bow-Tie framework to the case-study of regulatory frameworks reveals significant differences that need to be addressed in order for inter-agency recognition. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Aeronautical Journal;118 (1210), pp. 1433-1452
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000010137
dc.rights Material on these pages is copyright Cambridge University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Hypertext links to other Web locations are for the convenience of users and do not constitute any endorsement or authorisation by Cambridge University Press. en_US
dc.subject airworthiness en_US
dc.subject safety management en_US
dc.subject aviation en_US
dc.subject military aviation en_US
dc.title The PBP Bow-Tie framework for the systematic representation and comparison of military aviation regulatory frameworks en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1017/S0001924000010137
dc.contributor.sponsor DGTA-ADF en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics