dc.contributor.author |
Larrucea, Xabier |
|
dc.contributor.author |
O'Connor, Rory V. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Laporte, Claude Y. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-01-03T14:57:13Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-01-03T14:57:13Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10344/5420 |
|
dc.description |
peer-reviewed |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
When many people think of software companies, they think of the large organizations that have become so
well known in the marketplace. However, a flow of offerings are also coming from smaller organizations,
including very small entities (VSEs), which have 25 or fewer employees. Moreover, most products and
services from big software vendors depend on third-party components and other forms of collaboration
involving VSEs or small units within large organizations. Thus, small and very small organizations—which
include most software startups [1] —are the global software industry’s dominant force [2] and are crucial to
its competitiveness and innovation.
Software process is a leading research area for software-engineering academics. And managing software
process is a big challenge for practitioners. Large organizations typically have used traditional softwareprocess-
improvement (SPI) models such as CMMI and ISO/IEC 15504 (also called Software Process
Improvement and Capability Determination [SPICE]). Smaller organizations generally haven’t done so for
many reasons, such as the perception that these efforts were developed by and for larger organizations, are
costly, require much documentation and bureaucracy, and don’t clearly establish software processes [3].
For many small and very small software companies, implementing software-development management
controls and structures is a major challenge. At a time when software quality is a key to competitive
advantage, organizations are using only a few of the most popular ISO/IEC systems and softwareengineering
standards. Research shows that small and very small companies often have difficulty relating
ISO/IEC standards to their business needs and justifying their application to their business practices [4].
Most don’t see their net benefit; lack expertise; or can’t afford the necessary employees, cost, and time.
In 2011, driven by VSEs’ increasing importance and growing need for systems and software life cycle
profiles and guidelines, the International Organization for Standardization and the International
Electrotechnical Commission jointly published a set of ISO/IEC 29110 standards and guides (available at
no cost from ISO at http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html). Other initiatives
are devoted to small entities—some from Latin America, such as Competisoft [5] and others from Europe,
such as ITmark. But ISO/IEC 29110 is becoming the widely adopted standard [6]. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
IEEE Computer Society |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
IEEE Software;33 (2), pp. 85-89 |
|
dc.relation.uri |
http:dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2016.42 |
|
dc.rights |
© 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
software companies |
en_US |
dc.subject |
large organizations |
en_US |
dc.subject |
software engineering |
en_US |
dc.title |
Software process improvement in very small organizations |
en_US |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
en_US |
dc.type.supercollection |
all_ul_research |
en_US |
dc.type.supercollection |
ul_published_reviewed |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1109/MS.2016.42 |
|
dc.rights.accessrights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
en_US |