University of Limerick Institutional Repository

Are whole-word measurements of speech accuracy more sensitive to change than segmental measurements?

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Wright, Aileen
dc.contributor.author O'Connor, Padraig
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-21T12:52:07Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-21T12:52:07Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/4979
dc.description non-peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Measurement of change occurring during and after intervention is a critical part of evidence based practice. Therefore, it is imperative to find measurements that are sensitive enough to show real change. In intervention for speech sound disorders (SSDs), therapists have traditionally used a range of measurements. Currently there seems to be no consensus on the most valid method of measuring changes in speech accuracy (Flipsen et al. 2005). This has negative consequences for evidence-based practice. Objectives: This project investigates whether a whole word measure of speech accuracy, Proportion of Whole Word Proximity (PWP), is more sensitive to change than the segmental measure, Percentage Consonants Correct (PCC), most commonly used in the literature. Methods: 12 monolingual children with SSDs aged between 3;0 and 4;11 took part in the study. Participants were assessed in single word production using the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP) (Dodd et al. 2002), and in continuous speech using the Renfrew Action Picture Test (RAPT) (Renfrew 1997) at initial assessment and again 8 weeks later. Results: Analysis showed a high correlation between PCC and PWP. For the whole group, there was no statistically significant difference between PCC and PWP in measuring change. However, this may have been due to the fact that no significant change occurred at group level. Analysis of individual cases where significant change did occur showed that the different methods were differentially sensitive to different types of change. Conclusions: In this sample, PCC appeared to be a more sensitive measure of change in features, while PWP appeared to be more sensitive to changes in structure. Clinical implications are discussed and recommendations are made. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher University of Limerick en_US
dc.subject speech accuracy en_US
dc.subject measurement of change en_US
dc.subject percentage consonants correct (PCC) en_US
dc.subject proportion of whole word proximity (PWP) en_US
dc.title Are whole-word measurements of speech accuracy more sensitive to change than segmental measurements? en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_theses_dissertations en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics