University of Limerick Institutional Repository

The effect of low-dye taping on rearfoot motion and plantar pressure during the stance phase of gait

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author O'Sullivan, Kieran
dc.contributor.author Kennedy, Norelee
dc.contributor.author O'Neill, Emer
dc.contributor.author Ni Mhainin, Una
dc.date.accessioned 2013-02-20T12:42:44Z
dc.date.available 2013-02-20T12:42:44Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/2907
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Low-dye (LD) taping is commonly used to reduce rearfoot pronation. No studies have previously investigated the effectiveness of LD taping using both plantar pressure distribution (F-Scan) and 3-D (CODA) analysis of rearfoot motion. Methods: 20 healthy subjects with a navicular drop test exceeding 10 mm participated in the study. T tests were used to determine whether significant (p < 0.05) differences in plantar pressure and rearfoot motion occurred with LD taping. Results: LD taping resulted in statistically significant increases in peak plantar pressure in the lateral midfoot (p = 0.000), along with significant decreases in pressure in the medial forefoot (p = 0.014), and the medial (p = 0.000) and lateral hindfoot (p = 0.007). No significant changes occurred in the medial midfoot (p = 0.794) or lateral forefoot (p = 0.654). When assessed using motion analysis, taping resulted in a statistically significant decrease in rearfoot pronation (p = 0.006), supination (p = 0.025) and total rearfoot range of motion (p = 0.000). The mean rearfoot position during stance was not significantly different however (p = 0.188). Conclusion: LD taping is associated with alterations in peak plantar pressure in the midfoot and forefoot that indicate reduced pronation with LD taping. However, LD taping appears to reduce both pronation and supination in the rearfoot, rather than simply reducing pronation, when assessed using 3D motion analysis. Therefore, it would appear that LD taping does indeed reduce pronation, by restricting rearfoot motion in general, rather than pronation specifically. The degree of change observed with LD taping was however very small, and further research is needed to clarify the clinical significance of these initial findings. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;9,111
dc.relation.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-111
dc.subject plantar pressure en_US
dc.subject LD taping en_US
dc.title The effect of low-dye taping on rearfoot motion and plantar pressure during the stance phase of gait en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.internal.rssid 1408389


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics