University of Limerick Institutional Repository

Traditional factors of fit, perceived quality, and speed of publication still outweigh open access in authors’ journal selection criteria

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dalton, Michelle
dc.date.accessioned 2012-12-20T11:42:22Z
dc.date.available 2012-12-20T11:42:22Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/2760
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective – To determine the extent to which the open access (OA) status of a journal influences authors in their journal selection decisions and to analyze the sources of funding for the article-processing charges (APCs) applied in professional OA publishing. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher University of Alberta Learning Services en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Evidence Based Library and Informaton Practice;7(4), pp. 102-104
dc.relation.uri http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP
dc.subject scholarly publishing en_US
dc.subject open access en_US
dc.title Traditional factors of fit, perceived quality, and speed of publication still outweigh open access in authors’ journal selection criteria en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.internal.rssid 1415124


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics