University of Limerick Institutional Repository
Traditional factors of fit, perceived quality, and speed of publication still outweigh open access in authors’ journal selection criteria
DSpace Repository
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Dalton, Michelle | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-20T11:42:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-12-20T11:42:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10344/2760 | |
| dc.description | peer-reviewed | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective – To determine the extent to which the open access (OA) status of a journal influences authors in their journal selection decisions and to analyze the sources of funding for the article-processing charges (APCs) applied in professional OA publishing. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Alberta Learning Services | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Evidence Based Library and Informaton Practice;7(4), pp. 102-104 | |
| dc.relation.uri | http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP | |
| dc.subject | scholarly publishing | en_US |
| dc.subject | open access | en_US |
| dc.title | Traditional factors of fit, perceived quality, and speed of publication still outweigh open access in authors’ journal selection criteria | en_US |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | en_US |
| dc.type.supercollection | all_ul_research | en_US |
| dc.type.supercollection | ul_published_reviewed | en_US |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.internal.rssid | 1415124 |
