University of Limerick Institutional Repository

Solidarity matters: prototypicality and minority and majority adherence to national COVID-19 health advice

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Foran, Aoife-Marie
dc.contributor.author Roth, Jenny
dc.contributor.author Jay, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Griffin, Siobhan M.
dc.contributor.author Maher, Paul J.
dc.contributor.author McHugh, Cillian
dc.contributor.author Bradshaw, Daragh
dc.contributor.author Ryan, Megan
dc.contributor.author Quayle, Michael
dc.contributor.author Muldoon, Orla T.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-23T08:11:44Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-23T08:11:44Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/10598
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract The effectiveness of measures introduced to minimise the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19) depends on compliance from all members of society. The Irish response to COVID-19 has been framed as a collective effort, fostering national solidarity. However, dominant representations of the national community often unreflexively reaffirm the prototypicality of majority group members, implicitly marginalizing minority group members. This may have implications for adherence behaviours. We propose that majority/minority membership of the national community predicts adherence to COVID-19 health advice via prototypicality and national solidarity. In Study 1, we collected data online from Irish residents (N = 1,185) during the first wave of restrictions in Ireland’s response. In Study 2, we collected data from Irish residents (N = 537) during the second wave of restrictions, with more targeted sampling of minority groups. Based on these two studies, there is no difference between minority and majority group members’ adherence behaviours. However, mediation analysis showed that greater adherence to COVID-19 health advice is shown when group members perceive themselves to be prototypical of the Irish national community, and thereby show greater national solidarity. In Study 3, we manipulated an appeal to adhere to restrictions (N = 689) and show that an inclusive solidarity appeal increased reported intentions to adhere to COVID-19 restrictions compared to an exclusive solidarity appeal among minority group members. These findings suggest that appeals to national solidarity in response to COVID-19 will be most successful when they reference the diversity of the nation. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Ubiquity Press en_US
dc.relation COV19-2020-120 en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries International Review of Social Psychology;34(1) 25, pp. 1–13
dc.subject COVID-19 en_US
dc.subject health advice en_US
dc.title Solidarity matters: prototypicality and minority and majority adherence to national COVID-19 health advice en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5334/irsp.549
dc.contributor.sponsor HRB en_US
dc.contributor.sponsor IRC en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics