University of Limerick Institutional Repository

Lumbo-pelvic proprioception in sitting is impaired in subgroups of low back pain–but the clinical utility of the differences is unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Korakakis, Vasileios
dc.contributor.author O'Sullivan, Kieran
dc.contributor.author Kotsifaki, Argyro
dc.contributor.author Sotiralis, Yiannis
dc.contributor.author Giakas, Giannis
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-04T11:20:19Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-04T11:20:19Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10344/10054
dc.description peer-reviewed en_US
dc.description.abstract Altered spinal postures and altered motor control observed among people with non-specific low back pain have been associated with abnormal processing of sensory inputs. Evidence indicates that patients with non-specific low back pain have impaired lumbo-pelvic proprioceptive acuity compared to asymptomatic individuals. Objective To systematically review seated lumbo-pelvic proprioception among people with non-specific low back pain. Methods Five electronic databases were searched to identify studies comparing lumbo-pelvic proprioception using active repositioning accuracy in sitting posture in individuals with and without non-specific low back pain. Study quality was assessed by using a modified Downs and Black’s checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted tool for cross-sectional design and case–control studies. We performed meta-analysis using a random effects model. Meta-analyses included subgroup analyses according to disability level, directional subgrouping pattern, and availability of vision during testing. We rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Library of Science en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries PLoS ONE;16(4), e0250673
dc.subject spinal postures en_US
dc.title Lumbo-pelvic proprioception in sitting is impaired in subgroups of low back pain–but the clinical utility of the differences is unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en_US
dc.type.supercollection all_ul_research en_US
dc.type.supercollection ul_published_reviewed en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0250673
dc.contributor.sponsor Qatar National Library en_US
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics