| dc.contributor.author | Fitzgerald, Brian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Adam, Frédéric | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-30T12:01:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-10-30T12:01:18Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10344/2644 | |
| dc.description | peer-reviewed | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | why this is the case, and puts forward a framework which has been developed to analyse the emergence of the IS field, its relationship with associated disciplines, and the problems it currently faces. These problems are of a fundamental nature and include the field's identity crisis and epistemological problems; the failure to erect barriers to entry; the reference discipline problem; and the trend towards increased divergence rather than harmony and convergence in the field. Urgent research is needed to lay the foundation of a model for progress in the IS field which will support the evolution of the field towards control and harmony. This need is now stronger than ever at a time when the status of IS comes under attack in academic circles and the field seems to be under pressure to establish a stronger identity and solve fundamental methodological problems. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Information Systems, Lisbon;pp. 17-32 | |
| dc.subject | IS field | en_US |
| dc.subject | analysing | en_US |
| dc.subject | evolution | en_US |
| dc.subject | stable | en_US |
| dc.title | A framework for analysing the evolution of the IS field - can IS become a stable discipline? | en_US |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject | en_US |
| dc.type.supercollection | all_ul_research | en_US |
| dc.type.supercollection | ul_published_reviewed | en_US |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |